| |
| |
Anonymous
at 13:8 23/6/2009
|
so he must own tons of microsoft stock, right? is that why microsoft's success is so friggin important to you?
|
huff_diggler
at 13:4 23/6/2009
|
i wish my dad worked for microsoft or even sony for that matter, he's a sound engineer with his own business.
|
Anonymous
at 12:21 23/6/2009
|
who argue about video game consoles? what a bunch of pussy nerd fags. what, does your dad work for microsoft/sony? get a life
|
huff_diggler
at 19:30 22/6/2009
|
XBOX!XBOX!XBOX!XBOX!XBOX!XBOX! and the boy's go marching ON!ON!ON!
|
scott
at 19:2 22/6/2009
|
@Anonymous at 8:47 - since when did overtaking ea into number one slot result in overperforming? Well done activision, sony has bullied far too many including the consumer with its eula rights for TOO long. About time someone said FU to sony
|
Anonymous
at 14:46 22/6/2009
|
I was expecting something else like and some cursing or head bashing.
|
adis
at 14:2 22/6/2009
|
bla bla what a boring response. I was hoping at least a "GTFO" from Sony :D
|
Yazan-san
at 13:15 22/6/2009
|
meaning "we don't care!"
|
iwantcrack
at 11:14 22/6/2009
|
there's no place like home *clickclack*
|
Anonymous
at 8:46 22/6/2009
|
here's a translation:activision has been an underperforming publisher and we don't mind if they leave us.
|
Anonymous
at 7:49 22/6/2009
|
Translated: "Please don't leave us Activision."
|
Anonymous
at 5:19 22/6/2009
|
This response is pig-latin for "we will not lower PS3 prices b/c we need the money to make up for the 1 billion dollar loss the PS3 has given us."
|
Anonymous
at 5:8 22/6/2009
|
"How is this a response?"Simple Activision is not a limpd**k publisher and Sony can't afford to have them mad (or lose them) at them so they respond in a positive manner so that neither party feels that it has to respond more aggressively
|
Anonymous
at 5:4 22/6/2009
|
How is this a response?
|
urmom
at 3:34 22/6/2009
|
uh wtf im confused
|
Anonymous
at 2:34 22/6/2009
|
Dull s**te sony.
English: PULL YOUR HEAD OUT,
OUT OF YOUR ASS!
|
