| |
| |
Anonymous
at 6:17 14/12/2007
|
Oh wait, i thought Intel developed the x86 cpu..... amd copying right from the word go lol.
|
Anonymous
at 11:49 12/12/2007
|
hmmm I dont see AMD working on a light(optical) based processor.
|
J-L
at 10:12 11/12/2007
|
I see AMD as the highest quality processor you can get. Intel, I imagine,"throws" things from the production line and onto the shelf, and the charge the world for it. I have an AMD x64 3500. It runs EVERYTHING (crysis and anything on those lines). Its fast, sturdy, TRUSTWORTHY (my friends Core 2 just dies...so does my other friends...and his...and his...) Intel = quantity (and cheap new technology)
AMD = quality AND the newest tech.take your pick...
|
Anonymous
at 15:21 9/12/2007
|
lulz amd is full of sh*t
|
Anonymous
at 14:53 8/12/2007
|
Yeah AMD is not doing so well so they throw slander at intel...I'm all for intel they deliver a quality and affordable product. They have always replaced any defective part for me free of charge. Statements like this from AMD will do nothing but harm their reputation.
|
Anonymous
at 10:16 8/12/2007
|
Intel wins!
|
Anonymous
at 11:1 7/12/2007
|
CPU's will have different
specialised cores in the future.
For instance, imagine a tiny GPU core
which can do physics calculations 10
times faster than a normal core.
That is why AMD bought ATi.
Intel is doing similar stuff.
|
Suck it AMD
at 22:11 6/12/2007
|
MD is so full of s**t. The reason why Intel outsells AMD is because it's a much better processor. Intel has always been ahead of the game that's why they own the market. As far as price is concerned...you get what you pay for!AMD's biggest problem was the merger with ATI. ATI's last line was a total flop. Not to mention they lie to their customers saying their cards have hardware HD decoding when they don't! Cutting edge, innovative? I think not!
|
Anonymous
at 21:29 6/12/2007
|
hhahhaha!! intel has Celeron legs!!
|
Anonymous
at 14:56 6/12/2007
|
and multicore came from hyperthreading which was released long before X2
|
Anonymous
at 14:53 6/12/2007
|
go look up PCI, AGP, bluetooth and USB on wiki. i did it on a 4 year college course in electronics
|
Anonymous
at 9:21 6/12/2007
|
lmao, they sound like a bunch of whiney cvnts dont they.
Who gives a damn who copies who so long as the product is powerfull and value for money.amd dont seem to be able to do anything right atm, getting kicked in the nuts by both intel and nvidia.However i`ll be the 1st to buy an amd/ati product when they dont svck as much as they do now!
Get over it ladies.
|
killx
at 22:13 5/12/2007
|
anon @ 14:46 LOL. I need not say anymore, otehr then maybe go read something
|
Anonymous
at 14:46 5/12/2007
|
Intel invented multicore, PCI, PCIe, AGP, bluetooth, USB and much more
|
Ć¥ßęг
at 10:19 5/12/2007
|
AMD has nothing they are the ones stuck in the past,there phenom is a total flop and is nine months late Intel is so far ahead of AMD it's silly to even think intel is coping unless they are bitter about the clock speeds at which these new AMDs run at and they are a joke indeed.Unless AMD starts getting those clock speeds up Intel will always be ahead and they are currently doing this with 45nm and 32nm.
|
xybertron
at 6:48 5/12/2007
|
Poor marketing strategy is what i see that's why intel is outselling AMD. I guess the only marketing strategy they have is to bash intel against this and that... like this one :-)
|
Anonymous
at 4:16 5/12/2007
|
Intel is under peoples nails, I worked for IBM who practically know nothing beyond Intel. As it is the only name that works for them, try getting a job there you'll see how biased their views are. Your required to hand in a written test, majority of the questions are circa 90's related. AMD owns their asses no question to it, AMD processors are more stable and allow dual 32bit and 64bit applications to run natively.
|
Anonymouse
at 1:58 5/12/2007
|
Intel are a bunch of f**king faggots.
|
Anonymous
at 1:9 5/12/2007
|
I think you mean Athlon 64 there slappy, not 62.
Its ok, we make mistakes, just like Intel!
LOL!
|
Slappy
at 1:3 5/12/2007
|
I have never had any problems with Intel in the past but my AMD 62 x2 run pretty smooth.
As long as it works I will buy it.
I don't care who is #1.
|
dan
at 11:53 4/12/2007
|
well with that logic it should'nt be difficult for AMD to take the elad it used to have over Intel back.get innovating and walk the walk
|
rufus
at 11:28 4/12/2007
|
AMD USED to rock :]. Fanboy/girl statements like the first post are pointless...people buy the best bang for the buck. Get over it and stop living in your happy AMD dream world.
|
killx
at 10:16 4/12/2007
|
well AMD defiantly has a point, and Intel does over charge there top of the line CPU's, AMD was at the same prices years ago when they did have CPU's that were faster then Intel's. while they may innovate, Intel manages to create something better, or at least they have been the past little while.
|
Anonymous
at 8:50 4/12/2007
|
whats the point in claiming the first post if you're going to post as Anonymous?
|
Anonymous
at 7:53 4/12/2007
|
First post. Amd rocks intel sucks.
|
