| |
| |
Anonymous
at 20:40 20/9/2008
|
Hey Monsgov. ‹^› ‹(•¿•)› ‹^›
|
Anonymous
at 12:34 6/8/2008
|
Deeee Wabbbblow sux ballz!!
|
Monsgov
at 9:22 11/7/2008
|
diablo is a s**t game for retard people.
|
Blayze
at 15:33 9/7/2008
|
It *is* 3D? Hmm, I thought Blizzard weren't changing that aspect.
|
???
at 19:38 8/7/2008
|
the guy is a idiot talking s**t about a game that only just been announced maybe they should spend the time adding all the stuff they left out in oblivion like spears and good looking armor for once! be for talking s**t about some ones game that they no nothing about so fix your s**t be for talking s**t
|
Anonymous
at 4:35 7/7/2008
|
Diablo 3 looks good, if mr cheng wants to f**k with the fans, make a better game?
Rumour has it fallout 3 has ruined its traditions??
|
Wanker
at 21:51 6/7/2008
|
Like I give a damn what this guy thinks.
He doesn't like it?
Oh well!
|
Anonymous
at 4:52 6/7/2008
|
Diablo3 is 3D Blayze.. not isometric..
|
scott
at 4:15 6/7/2008
|
blizzard's ideas are so one dimensional.
|
Blayze
at 5:39 5/7/2008
|
Of course, what he *really* means is "Isometric? They're not using 3D? It's not like Oblivion! It sucks!"
|
Anonymous
at 20:59 4/7/2008
|
Blizzard are lame. sure they have made some good games in the past but they have only stuck to the same games for years, wheres the new "original" games
|
Anonymous
at 17:17 4/7/2008
|
diablo blows. silly buttmunchers
|
alf
at 14:29 4/7/2008
|
y tienes toda la razón, diablo 3 es más de lo mismo y además tardarán para hacer más e lo mismo 5 años en sacarlo por lo menos.
|
Anonymous
at 2:14 4/7/2008
|
I wish my dog would cook me breakfast...As for same old same old, look at Dracula X on psp, Absolutely AWESOME remake of an old game (remake, similar to sequal), and all it is is better graphics... so chances are Blizzards doing the right thing.
|
Anonymous
at 10:45 3/7/2008
|
If it ain't broken, don't fix it.Ass
|
JPRC
at 10:26 3/7/2008
|
If it was paintings, I would say that Mr Cheng is like a Picasso or Gauguin, and Blizzard is rather a Renoir or Rembrandt ...
They don't belong to the same School.Difficult to give carots to a lion, is not it? So then, better to consider that asking Mr Cheng what he thinks about Blizzard's latest production is like asking my dog not to overcook my breakfast... perhaps not the right guy for the job...
|
Smiley
at 9:47 3/7/2008
|
Let me get this straight, the producer who's BUTCHERING the fallout series, is whining about someone actually sticking to a good thing?Dear god, what an utter moron..
|
Anonymous
at 9:23 3/7/2008
|
The Diablo series is quiet frankly the best arpg game you can get. The fallout series on the other hand can only dream of being as good as Diablo. Besides a Diablo 4 and 5 can further improve graphics etc.u3krd
|
Anonymous
at 9:18 3/7/2008
|
5458416516
|
Slim
at 19:23 2/7/2008
|
There's nothing wrong with using the same formula, especially for a sequel. Just look at the Call of Duty series for proof. Now in Diablo 3, they added just enough new features, and tweaked the gameplay a bit to fine tune it much further. At first I really thought Diablo 3 would suck, but after seeing that trailer I am pretty impressed with it so far. As for our Bethesda friends, prove to us that you can avoid destroying the Fallout franchise like you did with Star Trek before talking.
|
Anonymous
at 18:37 2/7/2008
|
They suck at art? Are you kidding me? Have you not seen their cinematics?
|
????
at 18:29 2/7/2008
|
Lol seems like soome one is jealous of the huge fanbase of diablo and the quality of games from blizzard and wants to talk s**t about a game that only just been announced and we dont no jack about and only seen 1 small area
|
Anonymous
at 17:47 2/7/2008
|
f**king retards at bethesda can go suck a fat one, they are f**king up fallout 3. Blizzard is at least not destroying their franchises like bethesda is raping fallout 3. I hope diablo3 and star craft 2 are as similar to the originals as they possibly can be. YOU DONT CHANGE A PERFECT FORMULA. reard bethesda wankers. DaC forever. NMA can suck my bawls.
|
Anonymous
at 16:30 2/7/2008
|
Starcraft II and Diablo III currently runs on Mac OS X better than Vista.APPLE MAC OS X FOREVER NOOBS!!!
|
Stuart Robinson
at 15:16 2/7/2008
|
Damn who gives a crap, frankly when they take a working recipe "Starcraft, Diablo" and stuff with it too much for a revolutionary gaming exp..... they f**k it!!!! Let them do what they are doing becouse even if they turn out nothing better than shinier versions of there predicesors then Im happy!!
|
Anonymous
at 15:3 2/7/2008
|
LOL dude's name is Ashley
|
Anonymous
at 12:43 2/7/2008
|
Says the man that is currently screwing up Fallout 3.You have no right to tell people that thier ways are wrong!
|
TheShadow
at 12:15 2/7/2008
|
well for me and my friends who still play Starcraft since 1998, find it pretty interesting to get the same concepts with better graphics ^^
|
icarus
at 12:6 2/7/2008
|
He didn't say he was dissapointed with diablo 3, just that he was disappointed with the update system...
|
Anonymous
at 12:4 2/7/2008
|
Starcraft 2 looks like a Warcraft III total conversion. Same concepts from the previous decade, but better graphics.
|
Stefan
at 11:7 2/7/2008
|
Well this Cheng guy is probably going to ruin Fallout. When he does then what will he say? I wish I would have kept it similar. If we loved the old games so much would we really want drastic changes? We want more content, and whatever things were b***hed about fixed, along with a facelift. Other than that I'm pretty sure most agree if it ain't broke don't fix it.
|
Anonymous
at 9:42 2/7/2008
|
Blizzard makes good games with good gameplay, the graphics might not be state of the art but anyone with a PC in the last 10 years could probably play SC2 or D3, and thats a "smart" design choice. Especially for a gaming platform loosing players all the time.I dont know about you guys, my PC is only 3 years old, good ole first 512mb card (7800 GTX) in it and probably wont be able to play fallout 3 that well. At the end of the day, Warcraft/Diablo/Starcraft was probably a very huge part of our gaming experiences growing up that I we should just be glad blizzard is still around holding the PC gaming foundation together.
|
Anonymous
at 9:3 2/7/2008
|
"On the other hand, Diablo 3 and Starcraft 2's gameplay and art style don't look that much different from their predecessors."Whoever wrote this must be on crack. DIABLO 3 LOOKS LIKE WOW, NOT LIKE THE OLDER DIABLO GAMES. HOW CAN YOU SAY IT DOESNT LOOK MUCH DIFFERENT ASSHOLE?
|
Anonymous
at 7:59 2/7/2008
|
get a job, then you can get both... but dont have time to play either.
|
Anonymous
at 7:26 2/7/2008
|
what will you buyfallout 3 or diablo 3 diablo 3 it is blizzard wins again
|
Anonymous
at 6:59 2/7/2008
|
Actually Diablo's art is quite different in that it's cartoony. It's the gameplay that stayed the same. Pretty much the opposite of what Fallout did.
|
Anonymous
at 6:53 2/7/2008
|
at 5:35
yeah but most new games suck if you haven't noticed. Old is always good.
|
Anonymous
at 6:50 2/7/2008
|
i agree with Asheley tho. i was pretty disappointed when i saw SC2. i mean, it looks like a game made from 5-7 years ago. sure the gameplay will proly be great like the original, but then i'd just go and play the original and not bother with this.
|
Anonymous
at 6:37 2/7/2008
|
@4:52, STFU your to stupid to talk, "Blizzard sucks at art." Please..
|
Anonymous
at 5:52 2/7/2008
|
war... war never changes...
|
Anonymous
at 5:44 2/7/2008
|
Sometimes "Change" is bad.
|
Anonymous
at 5:42 2/7/2008
|
If it isn't broke, don't fix it.
|
Anonymous
at 5:35 2/7/2008
|
You should see Rockstar try to do hands and feet -- but yeah, I guess I was expecting too much out of D3 and Starcraft II. While the rest of the world progressed, they haven't.
|
Anonymous
at 4:52 2/7/2008
|
Blizzard sucks at art. They can't even do feet or hands correctly for gods sakes
|
